Eminent Domain And Keystone XL in Nebraska : Options : Declaration of Absolute Monarchy : Free Prior Informed Consent Paramountcy Doctrine

MAR 24TH  SINCE TIME BEGAN : salus populi suprema est lex - the right of the people is the supreme law : IN TRUTH WE TRUST  2017 ADE
http://kwamutsunnationstate.blogspot.ca/p/monarchical-nation-state-guidelines.html
THE ESSENTIALS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL JUSTICE
WHEN AND WHERE EMINENT DOMAIN MAY NOT BE SO EMINENT OR DOMINANT
TRUMP  POTUS  OBAMA
PRESIDENT TRUMP ISSUES KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PERMIT
&
DOMINA LAW GROUP REPRESENTS OPPOSED LANDHOLDERS
"Domina represented three Nebraska opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline in Thompson v. Heineman, filed in 2012. The suit argued that the Nebraska legislature illegally transferred eminent-domain powers along the pipeline route from the state's Public Service Commission (PSC) to the governor, in contravention of separation of powers and of a Nebraska constitutional provision giving such powers to the PSC.[26][27] The case was heard in Lancaster County District Court in September 2013.[28] In February 2014, the judge found for the plaintiffs, ruling the legislature's action unconstitutional.[29] The case was appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court, which issued its ruling in January 2015: a majority of four justices found the challenged pipeline-route law unconstitutional; the remaining three justices found that the plaintiffs in the case lacked standing to challenge the law. Since a five-justice supermajority was necessary to strike down a Nebraska law as unconstitutional, the court's decision effectively upheld the pipeline law, reversing the District Court's ruling.[30][31]" wikipedia
HENCE
HRH STITUMAATULWUT HWUNEEM
WONDERS
THE MATTER OF EMINENT DOMAIN AS KEYSTONE XL RENEWED CLAIM

As an experienced political nation state leader, hereditary indigenous consecutively settled sovereign Peoples (CSSP) absolute monarch HRH Stitumaatulwut Hwuneem of non-ceded Turtle Island North Kwa'mutsun Nation wonders :
  1. Whose political nation state proclaims jurisdiction to legislate statutes and regulations within the federal and state parameters that provide acceptable right within international law to consider the matter of EMINENT DOMAIN as a facilitating settlement mechanism in favour of the Keystone XL Pipeline project in Nebraska ?
  2. And, therein - through examination of U.S. constitutional law - are the foundational arguments of allodial title available to those landholders who oppose (through Domina Law Group) the considered Keystone XL Pipeline in Nebraska strategies ?
  3. This question is raised through examination of the history of the founding of the 1776 U.S.A. constitution; and, therein, how landed immigrants seized land and resources via the Terra Nullius claims. And, it is further advanced that the framers of this constitution successfully solicited, considered and adopted political customs and traditions of the Haudenosaunee / Iroquois Confederacy due to the relative inexperience of those claiming territorial integrity to structure the U.S. nation state in apposition (Boston Tea Party) to British King George III's claim.
  4. The ISIS strategies in claiming lands through religious and political advocacy can reasonably be compared to the founding of the thirteen colonies "landed immigrant" claim - therein implementing the Papal Bulls Inter Caetera and Romanus Pontifex (non-Christians are non-humans not capable of owning land), which deposed the traditional indigenous landlords of their historical (1100 indigenous nation throughout Turtle Island North / North America with a population circa 12-20 million Peoples) absolute monarchy paramountcy rights of governance.
In Summary : It may be a political option strategy for consideration by the Nebraska landholders opposing the Keystone XL Pipeline through their lands that :
  1. They may invite indigenous Peoples of the region (Native American Great Plains Tribes/Nations) to exercise their customary and traditional prevailing paramountcy CSSP international and domestic political rights by informing the United Nations that the territorial and governance claim by the U.S.A. is without merit; and, that, therein,
  2. The said Great Plains Peoples, supra, may also initiate a paramount right to determine who may trespass through their governed absolute monarchy territories; and, further, utilizing the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes laws (n.b. Kwa'mutsun example ) which they have the option to adopt into their governance regimes; as well as the U.N.Charter, Chapter VII provisions (to which the U.S. is obligated)
  3. The sought after resolution, being a binary governance provision that will respect land stewardship and environmental integrity of enterprises throughout the Americas.



POLITICAL COMMENTARIES PUBLISHED ON BEHALF OF HRH HWUNEEM, KWA'MUTSUN
BY
Shqwi'qwal   RALPH CHARLES GOODWIN   Yuxwuletun
CV2016 & ADDRESS
EMAIL
1.250.709.1809

Global Free Prior  AMBASSADOR : FPIC : TERMS GUIDE  Informed Consent
 
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)